U.S. Launches Precision Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Sites, Triggering Escalation and Global Economic Concerns

The United States has conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, escalating tensions between the two nations. The strikes come amid warnings from U.S. officials about potential terror threats inside the U.S. linked to Iran. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has requested a briefing for top lawmakers in Congress on the situation in Iran, though no briefing has occurred yet. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump commented on Iran's retaliatory attack on a U.S. air base in Qatar, describing it as "very weak," with 13 out of 14 missiles intercepted. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has also raised concerns, stating that the threat of sleeper cells in the U.S. has "never been higher." The situation remains fluid, with no new alerts issued at this time. The strikes and subsequent developments highlight the ongoing geopolitical tensions and the potential for further escalation.

The United States has conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, escalating tensions between the two nations. The strikes occurred amid reports that Iran has threatened terror attacks inside the U.S., though no new alerts have been issued at this time. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has requested a briefing for top lawmakers in Congress on the situation in Iran, but such a briefing has not yet taken place. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump commented on Iran's retaliatory attack on a U.S. air base in Qatar, describing it as "very weak," with 13 out of 14 missiles intercepted. The threat of sleeper cells in the U.S. has also been highlighted as being at an unprecedented level, according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The situation underscores the heightened geopolitical risks and the potential for further escalation between the U.S. and Iran. The strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are a significant development, given the longstanding tensions over Iran's nuclear program and the broader implications for regional and global security.

The United States has conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, escalating tensions between the two nations. U.S. officials have warned of potential terror threats inside the U.S. by Iran, although no new alerts have been issued at this time. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has requested a briefing for top lawmakers in Congress regarding the situation in Iran, but such a briefing has not yet occurred. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump commented on Iran's retaliatory attack on a U.S. air base in Qatar, describing it as "very weak," with 13 out of 14 missiles intercepted. The strikes and subsequent threats highlight the volatile relationship between the U.S. and Iran, with concerns about further escalation. Additionally, a former FBI boss has raised alarms about the potential for Iran to exploit "open borders" under the Biden administration to deploy terror sleeper cells in the U.S. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing developments and heightened security concerns.

In recent developments, Iran has launched strikes against U.S. forces stationed in Qatar as a direct retaliation for an attack on its nuclear facilities. This escalation has drawn significant international attention due to the heightened risk of further conflict in the region. According to reports, the timing and location point to strategic targeting by Iran to retaliate against what it perceives as hostile actions compromising its nuclear infrastructure.

Simultaneously, Russia has condemned U.S. air strikes on Iran, warning that such actions have opened a 'Pandora's box' with the potential to trigger a global 'nuclear catastrophe.' Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized that the U.S. strikes have pushed the world to a 'very dangerous line,' stressing the critical need for restraint to avoid escalating military confrontations that could destabilize international security.

In parallel political developments within the U.S., controversy surrounds decisions affecting military aid to Ukraine. Fox News reports disclosed that personality Hegseth authorized a pause on weapon shipments to Ukraine without informing the White House, a move that surprised insiders. Likewise, former President Donald Trump was reportedly caught off guard by the Pentagon's sudden decision to halt arms deliveries to Ukraine, further highlighting internal uncertainties about U.S. foreign and military policy.

These combined events underscore a complex international environment marked by escalating military retaliations, diplomatic friction, and challenges in U.S. defense and foreign policy coordination. The situation remains fluid, with significant implications for regional stability in the Middle East, the future of U.S.-Russia relations, and ongoing support for Ukraine amidst its conflict.

The United States launched attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz—on Saturday, escalating tensions in the Middle East. The strikes came as a surprise to investors, who had anticipated further diplomatic efforts following former President Trump's announcement on Friday that he would decide on an attack within two weeks. In a speech on Saturday evening, Trump warned Iran of either peace or "tragedy far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." Traders are now bracing for Iran's potential retaliation, with concerns focusing on possible attacks on U.S. personnel in nearby bases or the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil trade route. Goldman Sachs warned that a prolonged blockade of the strait could spike oil prices by 30%, pushing them above $100 per barrel. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China, Iran's largest oil customer, to intervene and prevent such a closure. Despite the heightened geopolitical risks, market reactions have been relatively muted. Analysts like Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge noted that Iran's degraded military capabilities and isolation, coupled with ample global oil supplies, may limit the conflict's fallout. Meanwhile, Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research highlighted the U.S. economy's resilience amid global turmoil, including the Middle East conflict and past events like Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Stock futures remained stable on Monday, with traders closely monitoring oil prices and Iran's next moves.

On June 22, Iran's state-owned Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament had approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz in response to U.S. airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities earlier that day. The final decision, however, rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council. The Strait of Hormuz, located between Oman and Iran, is a critical maritime passage connecting the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. It handles approximately 20 million barrels of crude oil daily, accounting for 20% of global consumption, and 20% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade. Closure could disrupt global energy supplies, potentially driving oil prices above $100 per barrel, according to Goldman Sachs and Rapidan Energy. U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio urged China to dissuade Iran from closing the strait, citing China's heavy reliance on its oil shipments. Rubio warned that such a move would be "economic suicide" for Iran, as it exports its own oil through the strait. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, speaking in Turkey, stated that Iran must respond to the U.S. attacks, which he described as crossing a "very serious red line." Meanwhile, experts like Zhu Xinrong of the Haitu Think Tank and Liu Qiang of the Shanghai Institute for International Strategic Studies believe Iran is unlikely to proceed with the closure due to its severe economic and geopolitical repercussions. The situation remains volatile, with Israel continuing strikes on Iranian military targets, including a missile attack on the Parchin military base near Tehran. China has called for international efforts to de-escalate tensions and maintain regional stability.

On June 21, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces had conducted airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites, describing the operation as a 'spectacular military success.' The targeted sites included Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, with Trump stating that Fordow had been 'completely and totally obliterated.' He detailed the attack, mentioning that six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired at the other sites. Trump emphasized that the strikes aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, warning that Iran's future held 'either peace or tragedy.'

The U.S. reached out to Iran diplomatically to clarify that the strikes were not intended to instigate regime change. An Iranian official, cited by the Tasnim news agency, confirmed that part of the Fordow site was attacked by 'enemy airstrikes.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's actions, stating that history would record the president's efforts to deny Iran dangerous weapons.

The airstrikes occurred amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, with both nations engaged in over a week of aerial combat. Israel had launched attacks on June 13, citing concerns over Iran's nuclear program. Iran maintains that its nuclear activities are peaceful. The conflict has resulted in significant casualties, with at least 430 people killed and 3,500 injured in Iran, according to Iranian state-run Nour News. In Israel, 24 civilians have died due to Iranian missile attacks.

U.S. political reactions were divided. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, a Republican, emphasized that the conflict was Israel's war, not America's. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine criticized Trump's decision, accusing him of poor judgment and noting widespread public opposition to U.S. involvement in a war with Iran. The situation remains volatile, with potential for further escalation.

On June 21, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces had conducted airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites—Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow—in what he described as a "very successful attack." Trump stated that Iran's nuclear program had been "completely and totally obliterated" and emphasized the use of six bunker-buster bombs on Fordow and 30 Tomahawk missiles on other sites. He declared, "Fordow is gone," in a post confirming the attack. An Iranian official, cited by Tasnim news agency, acknowledged that part of the Fordow site was hit by "enemy airstrikes."

The strikes occurred amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, with both nations engaged in over a week of aerial combat resulting in casualties. Israel initiated attacks on June 13, claiming Iran was nearing nuclear weapons development, while Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful. According to Iranian state-run Nour News, at least 430 people have been killed and 3,500 injured in Iran since the Israeli attacks began. In Israel, 24 civilians have died due to Iranian missile strikes.

Trump framed the U.S. strikes as a decisive action to prevent Iran from acquiring "the world's most dangerous weapons," a sentiment echoed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. However, U.S. diplomatic outreach to Iran clarified that the strikes were not aimed at regime change. The political reaction in the U.S. was mixed, with Republican Senator Jim Risch stating the conflict was "Israel's war," while Democratic Senator Tim Kaine criticized Trump's judgment, noting public opposition to war with Iran.

The situation highlights the fragile geopolitical balance in the Middle East, with the potential for further escalation. The attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure mark a significant escalation in the long-standing conflict between Iran and Israel, with broader implications for regional and global security.

The United States has intensified emergency evacuations and issued heightened travel warnings for the Middle East following former President Donald Trump's authorization of military strikes in Iran. The State Department also released a 'worldwide caution' security alert, urging American citizens abroad to remain vigilant due to the heightened risk of terrorism and potential retaliatory actions. The strikes, ordered by Trump, targeted key Iranian military installations, escalating tensions in the region. The US government has not disclosed specific details about the evacuations but emphasized the urgency for Americans in the Middle East to leave immediately. The 'worldwide caution' alert highlights the potential for violent actions against US interests globally, including embassies, military bases, and businesses. The State Department advised citizens to avoid large gatherings, monitor local media, and maintain communication with the nearest US embassy. The conflict's ripple effects are being felt internationally, with several countries issuing similar travel advisories. The situation remains volatile, with no immediate resolution in sight.

The global energy markets are experiencing significant turbulence following recent strikes on Iran, leading to a surge in oil prices and a drop in US futures. This development has raised concerns about potential economic shocks, particularly for the United States, as higher oil prices could exacerbate inflationary pressures and slow economic growth. The immediate aftermath of the strikes saw oil prices spike, reflecting fears of supply disruptions in the region. Analysts are closely monitoring the situation to assess whether Iran might retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments. Such a move could severely disrupt energy supplies and further escalate tensions in the region. The US futures market reacted negatively to the uncertainty, with investors bracing for potential volatility in the coming days. The broader implications of these events include heightened geopolitical risks and the possibility of prolonged economic instability. The situation remains fluid, with energy markets awaiting further developments to gauge the full impact on global trade and economic stability.

The United States conducted stealth bomber strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, causing significant damage while avoiding detection. The operation, which targeted key nuclear facilities, was executed with precision, and officials are currently assessing the extent of the destruction. The strikes were a response to escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with the latter having previously launched a missile attack on Tel Aviv, resulting in heavy damage but few injuries. The U.S. Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, emphasized that the U.S. does not seek further conflict but remains prepared to defend its interests. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, declaring 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN' in a public statement. The situation remains volatile, with Tehran considering four potential retaliatory measures. In a related development, a suicide bomber attack on a Greek Orthodox church in Syria killed at least 22 people, further complicating the regional security landscape. The Eastern half of the U.S. is also experiencing a heat dome, with dangerous temperatures expected to persist. The international community is closely monitoring the developments, as the potential for further escalation remains high.

On June 21, at 10:00 PM Eastern Time, U.S. President Donald Trump delivered a national address announcing that the U.S. military had successfully destroyed Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities, including those in Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan. Trump emphasized that the operation was a military success and warned Iran that future strikes would be even more devastating if peace was not pursued. He thanked U.S. military commanders and highlighted the precision and effectiveness of the operation, stating that no other military could achieve such a feat. Trump also mentioned Iran's former military commander Qasem Soleimani, accusing him of causing thousands of deaths, and congratulated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for their collaborative efforts in neutralizing the threat to Israel. The attack marks the first direct U.S. military strike on Iran, escalating tensions in the region. The U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres expressed deep shock at the attack, warning of the potential for catastrophic consequences for civilians, regional stability, and global security. He urged all parties to de-escalate and pursue diplomatic solutions. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, fearing assassination, has reportedly designated three senior clerics as potential successors and is currently hiding in an underground bunker. Israel has heightened its national alert status in response to the escalating situation. The attack has drawn mixed reactions globally, with some U.S. lawmakers criticizing Trump for bypassing Congress and risking war.

On Saturday, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that American forces had struck three nuclear sites in Iran. Trump warned he would not hesitate to target additional sites if peace in the Middle East does not come quickly, describing the struck facilities as 'the most lethal' while noting that many other potential targets remained.

The strikes have caused divisions among Trump’s political supporters, particularly in the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Some high-profile allies known for promoting a non-interventionist policy, including Steve Bannon, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, commentator Tucker Carlson, and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, had publicly opposed military involvement prior to the action.

These figures argued that aiding Israel in its conflict with Iran contradicted Trump’s prior commitments to avoid 'forever wars.' Following the announcement, some softened their criticism, with Trump stating that Tucker Carlson personally called to apologize for his earlier stance.

The strikes follow a period of escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, marked by missile and drone attacks. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected calls for surrender, while Trump did not rule out providing Israel with the means to destroy Iran’s underground nuclear facilities.

Though Trump did not release detailed assessments of the damage from the strikes, he emphasized that the U.S. is prepared for further military action, fueling debate over interventionism and the direction of his 'America First' agenda.

The Trump administration's recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites have sparked a heated debate within Congress, with mixed reactions from both supporters and critics. The strikes, conducted on Saturday, targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, escalating tensions in the Middle East. While the MAGA coalition largely backed President Trump's decision, prominent figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) have voiced sharp criticism. Greene accused the administration of a 'bait and switch' tactic in an X post on Monday, expressing concerns about the potential for the U.S. to be drawn into a 'nuclear' World War III. She emphasized her opposition to the strikes, stating, 'My children are 22, 25, and 27. I will literally fight ANYONE for their future.' Greene also criticized U.S. foreign policy, advocating for a shift in focus toward 'American interests and issues.'

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon noted the administration would need to justify the necessity of the strikes to its supporters. The MAGA movement, which initially appeared united in support of the strikes, faces potential fractures over the issue of noninterventionism, a core tenet of the 'America First' ideology. Some Republicans view the past 24 hours as a setback for the isolationist faction within the movement. Meanwhile, GOP leaders confirmed they were briefed on the strikes and expressed support for Trump's actions. The crisis in Iran has also been overshadowed by internal squabbles among senators during a recent hearing. The situation remains volatile, with ongoing debates about the legality of the strikes under war powers and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy.

The U.S. government, under the Trump administration, has intensified monitoring of potential Iran-backed sleeper cells within the country, particularly those linked to Hezbollah, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization. This heightened surveillance follows Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive earlier this month, which has escalated tensions in the region. FBI Director Kash Patel has spearheaded these efforts, though both the White House and FBI declined to comment on the specifics. The threat of Iranian operatives has been a persistent concern for U.S. officials since the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020, ordered by President Trump. The killing of Soleimani has exacerbated fears of retaliatory attacks within the U.S., prompting significant resource allocation by the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies to counter such threats. Late last year, federal prosecutors charged an operative of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and two U.S.-based individuals with plotting to surveil and assassinate critics of the Iranian regime, including former President Trump. The IRGC operative allegedly admitted to being directed by unnamed officials to plan an attack. U.S. law enforcement has long been wary of Iran's capacity to orchestrate or inspire domestic attacks, a concern that has grown since Soleimani's death. Recent years have seen charges against individuals plotting to assassinate high-profile figures, including Trump's former national security adviser, John Bolton. Additionally, Iranian-affiliated hackers have been accused of breaching the Trump campaign, raising concerns about cyber retaliation. While no credible threats have been identified, security measures around key locations like the White House, Pentagon, and Israeli embassy have been heightened. Intelligence agencies are re-evaluating known or suspected Hezbollah associates in the U.S. as tensions with Iran rise. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has warned of repercussions against the U.S., especially as President Trump considers military action against Iran. The U.S. remains vigilant, with assessments continuously updated to address potential threats.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has called on the oil industry to keep prices low, warning that higher prices would play "into the hands of the enemy." This comes after the U.S. conducted strikes on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend, escalating tensions in the Middle East and raising concerns about potential disruptions to global oil supplies. Trump made his demands via posts on his social media platform, Truth Social, on Monday, June 23, 2025. He specifically targeted the Department of Energy, urging them to "DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!" However, oil production decisions in the U.S. are made by private companies, not the government. The Energy Department does not directly control drilling activities.

Trump's posts followed a spike in global oil prices due to fears of supply disruptions from the Middle East. U.S. crude oil prices fell by 75 cents (1.02%) to $73.09 per barrel, while the global benchmark Brent crude dropped by 73 cents (0.95%) to $76.28 per barrel. Despite the initial volatility, the oil market remained relatively stable, with futures trading flat for much of Monday morning. Brent had surged over 5% on Sunday evening, briefly exceeding $81 per barrel before easing.

White House spokesperson Harrison Fields clarified that Trump's message was directed at oil producers, emphasizing the need to avoid price hikes that could benefit adversaries. The Biden administration, meanwhile, defended its past actions, including emergency oil sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in 2022, which it said stabilized markets during the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Oil analyst Clay Seigle noted that Trump's push for increased production reflects concerns over the Middle East conflict adding $10 to oil prices, previously weighed down by economic uncertainties. However, Seigle emphasized that oil companies base decisions on long-term market dynamics, not short-term political rhetoric. The U.S. remains the world's largest oil producer, but output growth has stagnated this year due to cautious industry behavior, ample global supplies, and modest demand growth.

The Democratic Party is deeply divided over President Donald Trump's potential military strikes against Iran, particularly targeting its nuclear sites. The divisions emerged as progressives, including Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Representative Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), voiced strong opposition to unauthorized military action, while party leaders like Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Representative Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) adopted a more cautious or even supportive stance. Trump announced on Saturday that the U.S. had struck three Iranian nuclear sites, escalating tensions and further polarizing Democrats. The strikes followed Israel's retaliatory attacks on Iran, which Schumer described as necessary given Iran's long-standing threats against Israel. Meanwhile, progressives like Khanna introduced legislation to prevent unilateral military action without congressional approval, emphasizing the need for a vote before any use of force. The debate reflects broader Democratic tensions over foreign policy, with some members prioritizing diplomacy and others aligning with Israel's security concerns. The situation has also highlighted the ongoing use of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which some lawmakers, including Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.), argue should be repealed to prevent unchecked presidential war powers. As the crisis unfolds, Democratic leaders face pressure to reconcile their positions ahead of the 2028 presidential election.

The Trump administration has significantly increased efforts to monitor potential Iran-backed sleeper cells within the United States, particularly those linked to Hezbollah, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization. This heightened surveillance follows Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive earlier this month, which has escalated tensions between the U.S. and Iran. FBI Director Kash Patel has spearheaded these monitoring efforts, though both the White House and FBI have declined to comment on the specifics. The threat from Iranian operatives has been a persistent concern for U.S. officials since the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020, ordered by President Trump. Late last year, federal prosecutors charged an operative of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and two U.S.-based individuals with plotting to surveil and assassinate critics of the Iranian regime, including potential threats against Trump himself. The FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies have allocated substantial resources to counter these threats, focusing on Iran's ability to direct or inspire attacks within the U.S. Additionally, Iranian-affiliated hackers have been accused of breaching the Trump campaign, raising concerns about cyber retaliation. While law enforcement officials are reexamining known or suspected Hezbollah associates in the U.S., there is currently no indication of credible threats. However, security measures around key locations like the White House, Pentagon, and Israeli embassy have been heightened as a precaution. The situation remains fluid, with assessments being conducted continuously, especially as President Trump considers potential military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned of repercussions against the U.S., further complicating the geopolitical landscape.

General Erik Kurilla, nicknamed 'Gorilla' for his formidable presence, is currently leading U.S. military forces in the Middle East as tensions with Iran escalate. The situation has drawn significant attention due to the potential for conflict and the strategic importance of the region. Kurilla, known for his aggressive stance and physical prowess, has been a key figure in shaping the Pentagon's plans regarding Iran. His leadership comes at a critical time, with the U.S. military preparing for possible strikes or other actions to counter Iran's activities in the region. The articles highlight Kurilla's influence over military strategies, contrasting with other figures like Pete Hegseth, who have deferred to Kurilla's expertise. The context of the Trump administration's push for a tougher stance on Iran is also mentioned, with Kurilla reportedly advocating for decisive military action. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing developments and potential implications for global security.

Global markets experienced significant volatility following U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, with oil prices spiking, stocks tumbling, and investors flocking to safe-haven assets like the U.S. dollar. The U.S. launched attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz—on Saturday, escalating tensions in the Middle East. President Donald Trump warned of further consequences for Iran, stating, 'There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.'

Oil prices surged by 4%, with U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude futures reaching nearly $74 per barrel, the highest since late January. Analysts from JPMorgan and UBS highlighted the potential for prolonged price increases if Iran retaliates by disrupting the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil trade route. Iran, the third-largest producer in OPEC, exports approximately 1.6 million barrels of crude per day. Historical data from JPMorgan shows that regime changes in oil-producing nations like Iran have led to sustained price spikes, with crude prices rising by 76% at their peak during past crises.

The stock market reacted negatively, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 300 points. Investors are bracing for Iran's response, which could include targeting U.S. personnel or closing the Strait of Hormuz, potentially pushing oil prices above $100 per barrel. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China, Iran's largest oil customer, to intervene and prevent such a disruption. Despite the heightened geopolitical risks, some analysts, like Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge, believe the conflict's asymmetry and Iran's isolation may limit broader market fallout.

The situation remains fluid, with traders monitoring Iran's next moves and the potential for further U.S. actions. The Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions are also under scrutiny, as rising oil prices could complicate efforts to control inflation. The global economy faces renewed uncertainty, with implications for energy markets, trade routes, and financial stability.